Building a Better Airport

To counteract all the gloom and doom from the previous week, here's some good news: a new campaign for a living wage for all workers at San Jose Airport.

Last week, WPUSA released a report documenting alarming security and retention challenges at Mineta San Jose International Airport, stemming from the practice of subcontracting airport duties to workers who are paid minimum wage with no benefits or time off and receive little to no training on security procedures.

Community, labor and faith leaders have now come together to call on the City of San Jose to adopt a policy that assures a living wage for all workers at the Airport, along with improved oversight of job and training standards at subcontractors. (Continued...)

The rapidly rising cost of living in the San Jose region makes this campaign especially timely; surviving in Silicon Valley at minimum wage, difficult at the best of times, is becoming nearly impossible.

On the scale of the regional economy, establishing a comprehensive living wage policy will help to make San Jose Airport competitive with SFO and OAK, which have been gaining air passenger market share at the expense of SJC. Both of these neighboring airports have already implemented Living Wage policies. If San Jose does the same, it will help hundreds of workers and their families climb out of poverty, and could give the local economy -- particularly the visitor and retail sectors -- a boost that we badly need.

Find out more at the campaign website: Building a Better Airport.

[ Continue reading Building a Better Airport ]

The Middle-Class Squeeze

A recently released study of inequality shows that nearly all the benefits of California's growth since the late 1990s have gone to just one group: the wealthy.

The "Pulling Apart" study from the Economic Policy Institute analyzed income gains state-by-state for low, middle, and upper-income Americans. Between the late 1990s and the mid-2000s, in California:

• The poorest fifth of families (with average income of $18,312) saw no significant income growth.


• The middle fifth of families (with average income of $50,981) grew by just $1,889, or roughly $315 per year.


• Average income for the highest-income fifth of families grew by $16,772. Most of this growth was at the very top of the scale; for the top 5% (with average income of $243,386), average income grew by $41,988.

This tremendously uneven distribution of growth led to stagnation for the middle class and the poor, and accelerated the growing gap between the very high-income and everyone else.

The gap between California's middle class families and the state's wealthiest residents is now the 3rd largest of any state in the country. (We can congratulate ourselves on providing a fairer shake for the middle class than Oklahoma or Mississippi, which were ranked #1 and #2.)(Continued...)

Because it does not include capital gains, this analysis actually underestimates the gap between the superrich and everyone else.

How do middle class Americans view this decade's economic shifts? In a recent poll of the U.S. middle class, 54% of respondents said that in the past five years, they had made no financial progress or had fallen behind. "Middle class" for this poll was self-defined by the respondents, 53% of whom identified as middle class (another 19% identified as lower-middle and 19% as upper-middle).

The Pew Research Center has been asking this survey question -- "Are you better off now than you were five years ago?" -- since 1964. This year, more middle class Americans said they were not better off than at any point in the past fifty years. An ever higher proportion, 79%, said that it's become more difficult for middle-class families to maintain their standard of living.

[ Continue reading The Middle-Class Squeeze ]